All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a healthcare professional.

  TRANSLATE

The Lupus Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the Lupus Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The Lupus Hub and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.

The Lupus Hub is an independent medical education platform, supported through sponsorship from Autolus and Biogen. Funders are allowed no direct influence on our content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders

Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients

Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.

Find out more

Hydroxychloroquine dose based on body weight for patients with SLE

By Amy Hopkins

Share:

Jun 4, 2026

Learning objective: After reading this article, learners will be able to cite a new clinical development in systemic lupus erythematosus.


Results from a retrospective observational study evaluating the effects of hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) dose based on actual body weight (ABW) in Japanese patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) were published in Rheumatology by Yamamoto et al. Endpoints included continuation rates, flare-free rates, efficacy, and adverse events (AEs) in the high-dose (HD; ≥5 mg/kg) and low-dose (LD; <5 mg/kg) groups. Subgroups consisted of Group 1 (patients who newly initiated HCQ; n = 182), Group 2 (patients who initiated HCQ ≥1 year after SLE diagnosis; n = 123), and Group 3 (patients from Group 2 who did not receive immunosuppressive therapy escalation after HCQ initiation; n = 104). 

Key data: Overall, 28.6% of patients in Group 1 discontinued HCQ. After inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) adjustment, the 5-year discontinuation rates due to AEs were 18.9% vs 13.6% in the HD vs LD groups, respectively (p = 0.314). Flare-free rates at 3 years favored HD vs LD HCQ: 75.0% vs 60.7% (p = 0.239) in Group 2 and 79.2% vs 57.8% (p = 0.141) in Group 3. Each 0.2 mg/kg increase in HCQ dose reduced flare risk in Group 3 (hazard ratio [HR], 0.91; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.84–0.99; p = 0.036). 

Key learning: A lower HCQ dose based on ABW may be associated with a higher risk of flare in patients with SLE, supporting the importance of ABW-based dosing while maintaining tolerability. 

References

Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements:

The content was clear and easy to understand

The content addressed the learning objectives

The content was relevant to my practice

I will change my clinical practice as a result of this content